Fewer genres are recorded than upstream records #62
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Fewer genres are recorded than upstream records from the same files.
Over
/mnt/mediawith remote providers disabled on both sides — offlineupstream (
var/big-upstream) records 231ItemValuesof type Genre wherethis port records 140.
Neither number comes from the internet: that database is upstream scanning the
same files with every remote metadata and image fetcher off, which is the
comparison
reference/README.mdrequires. So the gap is in what is read out ofthe files.
Not
<genre>in an NFO — the library holds none, and that path was just ported(#61). The genres this port records come from container tags, so the likely
ground is which tag names are read, how a tag holding several is split, or which
item kinds are asked for one at all.
Found while measuring #61 and unrelated to it.
Closing this as not a defect. I filed it on a stale database and the number
was wrong.
The 140 came from
var/big5, a scan taken before this session's tag-readingfixes. Measured against
var/big6, the recent music scan, the port records223 distinct genre values where offline upstream records 231 — and the
Audio and MusicAlbum counts match upstream exactly (223 and 208).
Every one of the eight accounted for:
Adventure,Animation,Comedy,Factualbig6scanned music only; upstream's database covers all three libraries. A scope difference, not a reading one.Drum And Bass;Electronic;Neurofunkbig6was written at 19:45, before that merged, and still holdsDrum And BassandNeurofunksplit apart.Glam Metal,OST,Stoner RockThe stronger evidence is the one already measured when #44 and #46 closed: over
the same library, 0 track rows and 0 album rows differ from upstream on
Genres. A count of distinct interned values is a weaker instrument than arow-for-row diff, and it is the one that misled me here.
The one real thing left is the third row of that table — an artist row carries
no genres here. That belongs with the other by-name gaps rather than under a
title claiming genres are under-read, and it is a provider feature besides.